We solve serious CRA tax problems

Help from a CPA Tax Consultant – Elections Under s.45(3) When Changing an Income or Commercial Property into a Personal Residence

FarisCPA Logo

For Canadian tax purposes, a property can be categorized in various ways depending on how it’s used. It can serve as a principal residence, be rented out to generate income, operate as a commercial space, or function as a combination of these activities. A property can also be classified as capital property or inventory. A property owner can change the way it’s used, turning a home into a rental unit or shifting a rental property back to personal use, for example.

When a person starts using property that was previously used to earn or produce income (business use) for personal purposes (making it their principal residence), the property is deemed disposed, i.e., it is treated as if it were sold at fair market value and repurchased at that same price. This can be a taxable event, putting the taxpayer in a tax crunch – no property sold or cash received, but taxes are still due.

A Quick Look at Filing s.45(3) Elections

To help taxpayers, when a housing unit that was once used to earn or produce income is then used by the owner as their principal residence, they can file an election under subsection 45(3) of the Income Tax Act with Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). By doing so, the property is deemed not to have been disposed and taxes are not due until the taxpayer actually sells the property. The election takes the form of a letter to the CRA, typically filed with the taxpayer’s tax return for the year in which the property is sold, unless requested earlier by the CRA.

This election cannot be made, however, if Capital Cost Allowance has been deducted for the property.

Completing Tax Forms

When a taxpayer elects under subsection 45(3) of the Income Tax Act to defer the recognition of capital gains resulting from a change in use of property from income-producing to personal use, the written election should clearly identify the property, specify the year of the change in use, and indicate that the election under subsection 45(3) is being made. 

Written Election Statement

There is no prescribed form for this election; however, it must include sufficient detail to satisfy the CRA that the conditions of the provision are being met.

Key details to provide in a written election include:

  • The address and legal description of the property
  • The date of the change in use
  • A statement that the taxpayer is electing under subsection 45(3)
  • An acknowledgment that the property was previously used to earn income and is now being converted to personal use

It is also important to note that you can’t make this election if capital cost allowance (CCA) has been claimed on the property after 1984. 

Keep a copy of the written election for your records. If you file the election late, the CRA may still accept it, provided you have a valid reason and submit a written request for a late-filed election. 

Filing a Schedule 3 for Capital Gains (or Losses) 

Even when a subsection 45(3) election is made, filing a Schedule 3 may still be required in the year the property is ultimately sold. When the property is disposed of, the taxpayer must report the capital gain in that year, using the original adjusted cost base and proceeds of disposition.

However, in the year of the change in use, a Schedule 3 is typically not used to report a capital gain if the subsection 45(3) election is validly made. The gain is deferred, and no disposition is triggered for tax purposes at that time. Still, some taxpayers choose to file a nil disposition entry on Schedule 3 in that year to document the change in use and reference the election to help maintain consistency and clarity in their tax file.

Protect Yourself from Audits & Reassessments

Contact us immediately if you’re unsure about how to draft the written election or determine your eligibility. These elections can get complicated, especially for properties with multiple owners, inherited properties, and those with mixed uses. An incorrect or incomplete filing can affect your ability to defer capital gains and can lead to reassessments or penalties.

 

As experienced and licensed CPA tax consultants, we help our clients handle all tax and accounting issues. Give us a call today at 1 844 340 5771 to schedule an assessment.

ACCA-Logo
AICPA-Logo
Chartered professional accountant logo
Chartered Professional Accountant in Canada, U.S. and U.K.

Testimonial

Sam Faris reduced the significant unreported income based on net worth audit to be nil. Sam’s approach in fighting these types of complex audits is unique and sophisticated. He found countless mistakes made by the auditor which were rectified when Sam appealed the audit decision. Instead of owing significant amount of taxes, Sam reduced it to zero. I highly recommend to hire Sam for this type of audits and any CRA problem.”

E.M., Ottawa
pro-tip

Pro Tip

ACCESSING THE SMALL BUSINESS DEDUCTION IN YOUR BUSINESS

The Small Business Deduction gives businesses a tax deduction on the first $500,000 of income. This saves an eligible corporation around up to $50,000 in income taxes. There are a number of conditions that have to be met to be eligible for this deduction.

This is an announcement from Aaron Baer, legal counsel to Faris CPA.

I have been working with Faris CPA for more than 10 years.

Faris CPA is being attacked by Kenneth John Weakley (Oct 1969).

I am posting this review because Kenneth John Weakley has been deleting his reviews and has been reposting them, so that Faris CPA's responses don't always show up.

Faris CPA's position is as follows:

Faris CPA is a well-regarded firm that is compliant with CPA Ontario obligations and has a good track record.

Under no circumstances will Faris CPA be paying Kenneth John Weakley any amount.

Kenneth John Weakley's claims do not have any merit.
Response from the owner:Thank you Aaron for your help with this matter. Please see below my entire response to Kenneth John Weakley (DOB: October 20, 1969). “Attention all readers: Faris CPA and 3 other reputable lawyers in the GTA are being aggressively attacked with fake Google reviews posted by Kenneth John Weakley (DOB October 20, 1969). Unfortunately, his repeated blackmailing and extortion attempts for the past few months have failed and he is still hoping to be successful by keep posting those false and fake reviews. Please note all personal information mentioned in our response is available online, publicly available and anyone can access it and none of the information was obtained while doing business with Kenneth John Weakley. Feel free to Google his name and see the below link to confirm. As such, there is no breaching confidentiality issue whatsoever. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/EfbNEs5kNSRQeb9uq8kdZL0LGm8/appointments This is a fake review posted by Kenneth John Weakley (DOB: October, 20 1969). Address: 821A Fulham Road, London, U.K. SW6 5HG
Had a very good experience with Sam and his team. They dealt with my CRA audit in the most efficient way possible. I admire their professionalism and expertise in providing answers to the CRA and providing a perfectly reconciled package which was a key to resolve the tax issue. If you look for a tax consultant firm, hire Farid CPA. 10 stars
Response from the owner:Thank you for the five stars and the positive review.
I was referred to Sam Faris by a family member who highly recommended him to deal with my CRA audit matter which has been ongoing for almost 2 years. Considering that this was a sensitive issue, I needed to make sure that Sam would be the right fit to handle my case. I requested an in-person meeting. I met with Sam for more than 2 hours. He went through CRA proposal letter and immediately identified the weaknesses in CRA’s calculations. He immediately advised on the best approach to dispute this proposal and provided a time line when he will submit the counter analysis. I was impressed with his confidence and his expertise and decided to retain his services. He worked on my file around the clock to ensure meeting the deadline. At the end, Sam was able to reduce the tax bill and I was able to pay it with no hesitation. While Sam was working on the file, he was in a full control with the situation by communicating with the auditor on timely and professional manners. I never felt that I was left in the dark as Sam was always providing me with an update. I do recommend to hire Sam for any dispute with the CRA. Thanks
Response from the owner:Thank you for your positive reviews and kind words.
Had a consultation with Sam about a tax situation and very glad I got professional advice on how to proceed.
Response from the owner:Many thanks for taking the time writing this amazing review.