We solve serious CRA tax problems

Help from a CPA Tax Consultant – What is a Canadian Controlled Private Corporation (CCPC)?

Photo of Sam Faris

A Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation (CCPC) receives preferential treatment under the Income Tax Act, most notably access to a reduced corporate tax rate on active business income below the small business limit. Determining whether a corporation qualifies as a CCPC is a key step in tax planning.

“Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation” is defined in subsections 248(1) and 125(7) of the Income Tax Act. In general, a CCPC is:

  • A private corporation that is a “Canadian corporation”;
  • Not a corporation with any class of its shares listed on a designated stock exchange;
  • Not controlled, directly or indirectly, by one or more non-resident persons;
  • Not controlled, directly or indirectly, by one or more public corporations;
  • Not a corporation that would be legally controlled by a hypothetical single person if that person owned all the shares held by non-residents, public corporations, or listed corporations.

A “Canadian corporation,” as defined in subsection 89(1), is a corporation that is both resident in Canada and incorporated in Canada. Although there are transitional rules for corporations resident in Canada in 1971, these rarely apply today.

Private Corporations & Control

A “private corporation,” also defined in subsection 89(1), is a corporation that is resident in Canada, not publicly listed, and not controlled by public corporations, Crown corporations (excluding venture capital corporations), or a combination of these. Transitional rules also exist here, but are generally not relevant in most situations.

Control is central to determining CCPC status. Where the Income Tax Act refers to a corporation being “controlled, directly or indirectly in any manner whatever,” both legal and factual control must be considered.

Legal control refers to the ability to elect a majority of the board of directors, usually through ownership of voting shares. Factual control involves the ability to influence the corporation’s key decisions despite not having legal control. This can arise from contractual rights, financial influence, or other arrangements. Factual control assessments are complex and require careful examination of the corporation’s governance and decision-making structures.

Comparing CCPCs with Other Corporation Types

Canadian-Controlled Private Corporations (CCPCs) are distinguished from other types of corporations in several key ways, especially when it comes to tax treatment, ownership rules, and access to certain incentives under the Income Tax Act.

Public Corporations

Public corporations are listed on stock exchanges and follow different rules for governance, reporting, and regulation. Unlike CCPCs, they don’t qualify for the small business deduction or tax credits and deferrals reserved specifically for CCPCs, such as the enhanced Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) investment tax credit. Their wider shareholder base and public disclosure requirements place them in a completely different regulatory category.

Corporations Controlled by Public or Crown Corporations

If a corporation is controlled by a public or Crown corporation, it’s automatically disqualified from being a CCPC, no matter its size or what it does. These corporations are seen more as part of the larger controlling body, which limits their ability to benefit from tax perks intended for independently run private companies. They generally don’t have access to the same deferral strategies or tax planning flexibility that CCPCs enjoy.

Foreign-Controlled Corporations

When a corporation is controlled—directly or indirectly—by non-residents, it doesn’t qualify as a CCPC. These companies are excluded from many of the tax advantages offered to Canadian-controlled businesses. They follow different rules around withholding taxes and can’t take advantage of certain domestic tax credits. Their setup usually reflects international business priorities rather than Canadian policy goals.

Subsidiaries of Listed Corporations

Even if a corporation is privately held, it can lose CCPC status if it’s controlled by a publicly traded parent. These subsidiaries might look like private companies on paper, but their ownership ties to the public markets mean they’re treated like public affiliates for tax purposes, and that comes with stricter limits.

Each of these corporate setups has its own purpose and advantages. However, for tax planning and eligibility for certain programs, CCPCs stand out due to their unique access to incentives designed to support private Canadian ownership. Knowing how your corporation is classified is crucial to taking full advantage of our tax system’s benefits.

 

As experienced and licensed CPA tax consultants, we help our clients handle all tax and accounting issues. Give us a call today at 1 844 340 5771 to schedule an assessment.

ACCA-Logo
AICPA-Logo
Chartered professional accountant logo
Chartered Professional Accountant in Canada, U.S. and U.K.

Testimonial

“I’m a successful entrepreneur but a terrible bookkeeper. I faced CRA tax audit some time ago and needed a competent Chartered Professional Accountant who could get me out of it. I was skeptical at first but Faris CPA really proved me wrong by dealing with it. If you’ve got any tax troubles, I’d certainly tell you to go to Sam Faris.”

Ghaith Bazzi
pro-tip

Pro Tip

ACCESSING THE SMALL BUSINESS DEDUCTION IN YOUR BUSINESS

The Small Business Deduction gives businesses a tax deduction on the first $500,000 of income. This saves an eligible corporation around up to $50,000 in income taxes. There are a number of conditions that have to be met to be eligible for this deduction.

This is an announcement from Aaron Baer, legal counsel to Faris CPA.

I have been working with Faris CPA for more than 10 years.

Faris CPA is being attacked by Kenneth John Weakley (Oct 1969).

I am posting this review because Kenneth John Weakley has been deleting his reviews and has been reposting them, so that Faris CPA's responses don't always show up.

Faris CPA's position is as follows:

Faris CPA is a well-regarded firm that is compliant with CPA Ontario obligations and has a good track record.

Under no circumstances will Faris CPA be paying Kenneth John Weakley any amount.

Kenneth John Weakley's claims do not have any merit.
Response from the owner:Thank you Aaron for your help with this matter. Please see below my entire response to Kenneth John Weakley (DOB: October 20, 1969). “Attention all readers: Faris CPA and 3 other reputable lawyers in the GTA are being aggressively attacked with fake Google reviews posted by Kenneth John Weakley (DOB October 20, 1969). Unfortunately, his repeated blackmailing and extortion attempts for the past few months have failed and he is still hoping to be successful by keep posting those false and fake reviews. Please note all personal information mentioned in our response is available online, publicly available and anyone can access it and none of the information was obtained while doing business with Kenneth John Weakley. Feel free to Google his name and see the below link to confirm. As such, there is no breaching confidentiality issue whatsoever. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/EfbNEs5kNSRQeb9uq8kdZL0LGm8/appointments This is a fake review posted by Kenneth John Weakley (DOB: October, 20 1969). Address: 821A Fulham Road, London, U.K. SW6 5HG
Had a very good experience with Sam and his team. They dealt with my CRA audit in the most efficient way possible. I admire their professionalism and expertise in providing answers to the CRA and providing a perfectly reconciled package which was a key to resolve the tax issue. If you look for a tax consultant firm, hire Farid CPA. 10 stars
Response from the owner:Thank you for the five stars and the positive review.
I was referred to Sam Faris by a family member who highly recommended him to deal with my CRA audit matter which has been ongoing for almost 2 years. Considering that this was a sensitive issue, I needed to make sure that Sam would be the right fit to handle my case. I requested an in-person meeting. I met with Sam for more than 2 hours. He went through CRA proposal letter and immediately identified the weaknesses in CRA’s calculations. He immediately advised on the best approach to dispute this proposal and provided a time line when he will submit the counter analysis. I was impressed with his confidence and his expertise and decided to retain his services. He worked on my file around the clock to ensure meeting the deadline. At the end, Sam was able to reduce the tax bill and I was able to pay it with no hesitation. While Sam was working on the file, he was in a full control with the situation by communicating with the auditor on timely and professional manners. I never felt that I was left in the dark as Sam was always providing me with an update. I do recommend to hire Sam for any dispute with the CRA. Thanks
Response from the owner:Thank you for your positive reviews and kind words.
Had a consultation with Sam about a tax situation and very glad I got professional advice on how to proceed.
Response from the owner:Many thanks for taking the time writing this amazing review.