We solve serious CRA tax problems

Limitations When Claiming Business Expenses

Business Expense Limitations

In an earlier article, a list of business expense categories used by the CRA was provided (see the article HERE). This is the second article in the series that hopes to help small business owners figure out what expenses are deductible and which ones are not. In this article, we are going to start by looking at the most common limitations on the deductibility of expenses in the Income Tax Act. One general limitation discussed in a separate article is that the expense has to be reasonable in amount and in substance (see that article HERE).

So, once you have removed the HST/GST portion, determined that the expense is reasonable, and that it is something that should be deducted to get to “profit”, are you good to deduct? The answer is “No!”. The Income Tax Act has a series of limitations that apply to all expenses with respect to business and property sources of income. There are much more restrictive limits for employment expenses, but that is for another article. The most common general limitations on business expenses, or tax deductions, are found in section 18 of the Income Tax Act. There are too many limits to address in one article, so we are going to focus on the most common ones that small businesses encounter.

The most important limit is also the first one listed in section 18. It says that NO amount is deductible unless the outlay was made or the expense was incurred by the taxpayer (being the person whose business or property profit we are calculating) “for the purpose of gaining or producing income from the business or property”. There is a lot to digest in these few words. The most important thing to notice is that it is a “purpose” test, not a “results” test. So long as the “purpose” of incurring the expenditure is to make income, it doesn’t matter whether that specific expenditure produces revenues or a profit (or even if the business itself is profitable). This makes sense since a business can have a loss year one tax-year and a profitable year in another tax-year. If expenses were not deductible unless there was a profit directly related to the expense, a business could never suffer losses. In other words, there is no need to show a causal connection between an expense and revenue or income. That said, this is not purely subjective. The expense must be part of the business – somehow related to the operations, transactions, or services by which the business earns revenue. If an ordinary person in that line of business would have incurred the expense as part of the business, then the purpose test is met.

The second limitation on what expenses are deductible relates to capital expenses. Despite accounting practice, you cannot deduct fully and all at once any expense that is “capital” in nature or that relates to “depreciation, obsolescence or depletion”. Where you incur an expense that gives you a lasting benefit ? where the expense is “capital” and not just operational ? then all deductions are only those the allowed by the Income Tax Act. Most of this is covered by the Capital Cost Allowance system that will be discussed in another article.

The next limit on expense deductibility we consider is that you cannot an expense that relates to producing exempt income. This makes sense. If the profits are not going to be taxable, why would the expenses (or resulting losses) be deductible?

The fourth limitation is one that many small business owners get caught by. The law doesn’t allow any deduction for “personal or living expenses”. The only exception to this is any personal or living expenses that are “travel expenses” incurred while away from home and traveling on business. There are some other expenses that are “personal and living” expenses that are specifically allowed. These specific expenses will be covered in the final part of this article series (coming soon).

The fourth limitation is one that many small business owners get caught by. The law doesn’t allow any deduction for “personal or living expenses”. The only exception to this is any personal or living expenses that are “travel expenses” incurred while away from home and traveling on business. There are some other expenses that are “personal and living” expenses that are specifically allowed. These specific expenses will be covered in the final part of this article series (coming soon).

  1. Is the expense widely accepted in the business community as a business expense?
  2. Is the deduction for this expense one that is ordinarily allowed as a business expense by accountants?
  3. Is the expense one that is regularly incurred by others that are involved in the same business?
  4. Would this particular expense have arisen if you were not involved in the business you are involved in?

Where the expense would have been incurred if you were not engaged in the business or, in other words, where the need for the expense exists independent of the specific business, then the expense is most likely one that is “personal or living”. A good example of this is ordinary clothing as compared to specific uniforms or specialized clothing. Whether or not a person is involved in any business or not, they will have to pay for clothing. This is just one of those expenses of living that has to be incurred no matter what. However, some items of clothing are either required as a uniform for a business, and therefore cannot be work elsewhere, or are specialized clothing (reflective vests, safety equipment, heavy duty work wear, etc.) that a person would not buy absent the specific needs of a business. The cost of this clothing would be deductible (though most likely the cost would be a capital expense). Another common example is the cost of travel to and from your place of business. Everyone needs to get to and from work, no matter what their work is (or whether they are employed or in business), and the cost of getting to work (and the choice of the transportation method) is a personal one.

To summarize so far, in order for an expense to be deductible it:

  • Must be reasonable,
  • Must be incurred for the purpose of producing income,
  • Must NOT be a capital expense,
  • Must NOT be related to earning exempt income, and
  • Must NOT be a personal or living expense.

The next article will discuss limits on a set of specific expenses.

About the Author

pro-tip

Pro Tip

ACCESSING THE SMALL BUSINESS DEDUCTION IN YOUR BUSINESS

The Small Business Deduction gives businesses a tax deduction on the first $500,000 of income. This saves an eligible corporation around up to $50,000 in income taxes. There are a number of conditions that have to be met to be eligible for this deduction.

Save your time and money and hire Sam Faris for any problem with the CRA. He is the man to fight the CRA and get you the best results. His firm a top consulting firm I have ever dealt with. He is honest, trustworthy and very professional on both personal and business levels. He won my case against the CRA and the audit went through very smoothly because of his top notch service and expertise. I wish I met Sam before. I paid other professionals but they were disappointing and did not deliver what Sam delivered.
Many thanks Sam and I will definitely refer my clients and family to him.
Response from the owner:Thank you for the five stars Google review and your kind words. We strive to provide the best customer service and to ensure that our clients feel that they are in a safe hands while we are working on their files. We understand that CRA audits are not a pleasant experience to have and we do our best to provide strong arguments to dispute CRA’s decisions and protect our clients’ best interests. Thanks you again and we will remain at your disposal if you need our service in the future.
I was referred to Sam Faris by a tax lawyer to handle my a complicated tax audit by the CRA and to refile all my outstanding corporate and personal tax returns. He was highly recommended by the tax lawyer and by other professional. The minute I hired Sam to sort out the big mess that I had with the CRA, I felt I am safe and in a good hands. He and his team were responsive to my questions and my concerns. Once he completed his work, he insisted to meet in person with the auditor and the team leader. His work quality was second to none. He backed up all accounts prepared a perfect reconciliation. On that basis, he presented his work confidentially and was able to convince the CRA team with his position and his calculations. I must admit that Sam Faris is the best tax consultant and he is a life saver. As a side note, his fee is very reasonable considering to other professionals and more importantly the work quality and the results that he achieved are unbeatable.
Response from the owner:Many thanks Moss for the positive review.
I was referred to Mr. faris by a friend of mine who happened to be his client for more than 10 years. I was struggling with the CRA reading HST and income tax audit. CRA claimed that I owe significant amount of HST and income tax. Mr. Faris was able to perform a detailed analysis which was backed up with previous court cases. As a result of his sophisticated work, he was able to convince CRA that the property was not subject to HST and income tax and the case was closed with zero hst owing. Thank you Mr. Faris for all your hard work.
Sam and his team are an amazing tax consulting firm. They know how the CRA operates and are able to get results based on your actual numbers, not the inflated CRA ones. More importantly, they are super professional and more cost-effective than I would've thought. The Faris team really are life-savers!
Response from the owner:Dear Aymann Your feedback is much appreciated. We have been in business many years now. We have dealt with countless and different types of CRA audits. We noticed that the CRA always attempt to assess on inflated numbers. We have been successful to reduce the CRA numbers and to prove to the CRA their numbers are inflated. As result, CRA would accept our numbers as our work is perfectly reconciled and backed up with the appropriate documents.
I found Sam online and I was I impressed with the excellent reputation and all the good results that he achieved to his clients. I decided to hire him to handle a complex matter with the CRA. With no surprises, Sam performed the work on timely manner and in the most efficient way possible. He kept his promises and he saved me significant amount CRA claimed that I owed. Sam was very transparent while working on my file and kept me in the loop. If you are looking for an excellent and expert tax consultant, Sam is the man. You will never be disappointed.
Response from the owner:My pleasure and thank you for the positive review.
Faris CPA has helped me to go through a very difficult time in my life while the CRA was after me and my family claiming that we have significant amount of unreported income. Sam and his team took over the file and dealt with it in the most efficient and effective way. They provided every single reconciliation and backup to show that the CRA assumptions are baseless. They were able to stop the escalation based on their sophisticated strategy and I am so grateful for them.
Sam and his team are expert and solid tax consultants who can fight CRA audits confidentiality and aggressively. They are the sharks and the best in the country to do so.
Response from the owner:Omar Your review and kind words are much appreciated. We are glad that you are happy with our performance and the outcome of the audit. we will remain at your disposal if you need our service in the future.
I was referred to Mr. Faris by another professional who recommended him to deal with my multiple years of outstanding corporate and tax returns. I interviewed Sam and was impressed in his confidence and transparency. He did not promise the moon just to get my business. Sam was able to file all returns under the voluntary disclosure program. After completing filling all tax returns, I realized the amount of money he saved me. I enjoyed very much working with him. He ensured that the work progress flow smoothly without any complications. He took to consideration the emotional stress factor and he was available to speak with me even beyond business hours just to make me more calm and to make me feel that he is on top of the matter and it will be resolved to my satisfaction. Indeed, this is what happened. The matter was resolved to my satisfaction and CRA concluded that the returns which Sam filed are reasonable and there is no need to further audit me nor my company. In summary, Sam is a life saver. He saved me and saved my family and now I am in the right track where all my tax filing obligations are met and I don’t owe any taxes. So grateful to Sam and his dedication while working on my file.
Response from the owner:Raj Thank you for the positive Google review. We are happy that you are satisfied with our services. Voluntary disclosure program is one of our specialties and we have dealt with many complex cases too. We get referrals from other professionals as we have been in the business of fighting CRA many years and we have countless success stories that many professionals are aware of. Please do contact us if you require further help in the future.
Sam is an excellent CPA and the best tax consultant in the country. He helped me to deal with a very complicated tax audit with the CRA where the CRA sent me a proposal assessment of 1.5 million dollars based on their net worth audit calculation and analysis. Sam was able to provide a counter analysis which highlighted significant mistakes that the auditor made with his assumptions and calculations. It’s ridicules that CRA wanted to taxed me on a loan that I obtained from my bank. Sam dealt with this audit perfectly. He demonstrated a very high level of expertise and CRA had to accept his counter analysis with no question asked. Many thanks to Sam’s efforts and high business standards in dealing with this issue and resolve it to my favor. I will have Sam as my primary CPA going forward so I can focus on doing business and will have a peace of mind in terms of the high quality of work done by him. Well deserved this review with the 5 stars rating.
Response from the owner:Yash Thank you for the positive feedback and the 5 stars Google review. We are glad that you are happy with our service and you are satisfied with the outcome. Net worth audits are very complicated and disputing them might get very tricky. We have been dealing with the same types of audits for many years and we are confident in fighting CRA and to point out mistakes that the auditor have made while performing the audit. We will remain at your disposal anytime you contact us in the future.