We solve serious CRA tax problems

What Does It Mean For a Business Expense to be Reasonable?

FarisCPA Logo

In Canada, a business is taxable on the profit it makes in its tax-year. You don’t have to be an accountant to know that “profit” means “revenues” less “expenses”. Though this seems easy in theory, the practice of determining what counts as “revenues” and when that is included in income, what are deductible “expenses”, and when they are deductible can be complex. This article will look at one of the conditions that an expense has to meet under the Income Tax Act before it is deductible from income.

There are a number of conditions to qualify an expense as reasonable, including that the amount of the expense has to be “made or incurred by the taxpayer for the purpose of gaining or producing income from the business or property”, cannot be incurred to gain exempt income, and that it cannot be on account of capital or depreciation unless specifically allowed by regulations. There are many other conditions for consumer-based businesses. One such condition is in section 67 of the Income Tax Act. This rule applies to an expense that is otherwise deductible. Section 67 states that no amount is deductible at all except to the extent that the expense and the amount of the expense is reasonable in the circumstances.

What does it mean for an expense to be reasonable in the circumstances and what is the outcome if the expense is not reasonable? This was the very problem a Mr. Peach encountered in a recent Tax Court of Canada Decision. Mr. Peach deducted a number of expenses, including meals and entertainment expenses, motor vehicle expenses, and business taxes and fees, and office expenses. These expenses are usually deductible. In this case, however, the Canada Revenue Agency took the position that the expenses and their amounts were not reasonable.

So, what is reasonable? First, an expense is not unreasonable just because it turns out to be the outcome of poor business judgment. It also doesn’t matter whether expenses exceed revenues and the business has a loss. The test the courts will apply is one that requires them to answer this question: “Would no person of business have paid such an amount in the circumstances of this specific taxpayer?”. If the answer is yes, then the amount is unreasonable.

The outcome depends on what about the expense is unreasonable. If the incurring of the expense itself was unreasonable, then the entire amount is not deductible. If, however, it is the amount of the expense that is unreasonable, then a court will reduce the deductible amount to what is a reasonable amount. You get less of a deduction, but at least you get a deduction of something.

ACCA-Logo
AICPA-Logo
Chartered professional accountant logo
Chartered Professional Accountant in Canada, U.S. and U.K.

Testimonial

“I was referred to Sam by one of Canada’s top tax law firms. I explained my tax issue with the CRA and he gave me free advice of what can be done to solve my problem. Based on the information Sam provided, I decided to hire him. Sam and his team were on top of things. They gave me a prompt solution that worked for me and was accepted by the CRA. After this experience, I hired Sam to be a controller for my business. I didn’t want to worry about my accounting and tax issues again, and with Sam, I know I don’t have to.”

W.K.Y., Manitoba
pro-tip

Pro Tip

ACCESSING THE SMALL BUSINESS DEDUCTION IN YOUR BUSINESS

The Small Business Deduction gives businesses a tax deduction on the first $500,000 of income. This saves an eligible corporation around up to $50,000 in income taxes. There are a number of conditions that have to be met to be eligible for this deduction.

I was referred to Sam Faris by a family member who highly recommended him to deal with my CRA audit matter which has been ongoing for almost 2 years. Considering that this was a sensitive issue, I needed to make sure that Sam would be the right fit to handle my case. I requested an in-person meeting. I met with Sam for more than 2 hours. He went through CRA proposal letter and immediately identified the weaknesses in CRA’s calculations. He immediately advised on the best approach to dispute this proposal and provided a time line when he will submit the counter analysis. I was impressed with his confidence and his expertise and decided to retain his services. He worked on my file around the clock to ensure meeting the deadline. At the end, Sam was able to reduce the tax bill and I was able to pay it with no hesitation. While Sam was working on the file, he was in a full control with the situation by communicating with the auditor on timely and professional manners. I never felt that I was left in the dark as Sam was always providing me with an update. I do recommend to hire Sam for any dispute with the CRA. Thanks
Response from the owner:Thank you for your positive reviews and kind words.
Had a consultation with Sam about a tax situation and very glad I got professional advice on how to proceed.
Response from the owner:Many thanks for taking the time writing this amazing review.
Sam helped me during a tax audit with the CRA. His performance was beyond expectation and I am very satisfied with the end results. Sam has demonstrated a high business and ethics standards and more importantly, he met all his promises. Well deserved excellent rating.
Response from the owner:Thank you Mr. Zahir for your positive feedback.
Very glad I contacted Sam and his team for help with my tax situation. I had worked with other accountants in the past but none of them were as knowledgeable and easy to work with as the Faris CPA team. They were able to help me resolve my situation and better prepare for the future.

Update - it’s been a few years now and can confirm that working with Sam as my tax consultant was an excellent choice and highly recommend him!